Why Harvard University isn’t a Harvard University? Antisemitism, the U.S. Government, and the United Nations
Harvard University was banned from recruiting foreign students in the United States last week, and three universities in Hong Kong are starting to recruit international students from the prestigious American institution.
The federal government’s Joint Task Force to combat antisemitism said in an April statement that Harvard’s lack of compliance “reinforces the troubling entitlement mindset that is endemic in our nation’s most prestigious universities and colleges – that federal investment does not come with the responsibility to uphold civil rights laws. The disruption of learning that has plagued campuses in recent years is unacceptable. The harassment of Jewish students is intolerable. If elite universities wish to continue receiving taxpayer funding, they should commit to meaningful change and take the problem seriously.
The measures taken by Trump are “perplexing”, according to the president of Harvard. He doesn’t believe that there is a correlation between funding freezes and fighting antisemitism.
We have to be firm in what we say we stand for. The pursuit of the truth, education and helping to educate people for better futures are what we stand for. And hopefully our own students, after they graduate from our institutions, go out and serve the world. We are about producing and disseminating knowledge and serving the nation and the world. When we fail in that, then we can expect to be attacked. So number one, I think we all need to redouble our commitment to the good of the nation and the world. And I know my fellow leaders fully embrace that.
The work of Harvard faculty won the “Oscars of Science” in the field of drugs to treat obese and diabetes, which benefits the U.S. public.
Harvard’s president says they should’stand firm’: an analysis of the Trump administration’s warning to international students in the United States
After a federal judge blocked the Trump administration’s attempt to force Harvard to allow international students to enroll, the president posted on his Truth Social account that the home countries of those students are not at all friendly to the United States. The president said his administration wants to know who those foreign students are.
Over that time, there was tremendous division on the campus. There are faculty and students who disagreed with one another about what the university should do. The main purpose of the report was to identify the problems we face, particularly with regard to Jewish and Israeli students. Some of those recommendations were already adopted, others are currently being worked on. I believe that we have a real problem in this regard, or we have a real problem. We will continue to address it, because we have done a lot.
Garber: I believe that we have made substantial progress on campus over the past year, and that’s what I’ve heard from many faculty and staff and students. There has been real progress. It is difficult to compare what goes on at a college with what goes on in the rest of the country. We have fewer violent incidents according to what I’ve heard. They’re not usually seen on campus and probably less vandalised. The main manifestation of antisemitism and anti-Israeli bias that we have grappled with has to do with social exclusion. It’s related to shunning. If other students refuse to talk to a Israeli student if they learn that he is Israeli, we will have a serious problem that we need to address.
Source: As Trump targets elite schools, Harvard’s president says they should ‘stand firm’
The Harvard Lawsuit: Is Harvard Really Interested in Research Universities? Inskeep: I’m sorry, Harvard is not interested in International Students
To the best of my knowledge, they are not true. I need to add, by the way, that this is clearly the subject of litigation, as you pointed out earlier. We tried to comply with the law.
Is that a small example of the kind of thing you’re trying to do? You want people to engage with each other in a civil manner but you don’t want to make them give up their ideas.
Is this what you mean? when, in the lawsuit, you say that without international students, which is a quarter of your student body, Harvard would not be Harvard?
Inskeep: What would you say to someone in the middle of the country who is listening to us and maybe thinking, “I really don’t have a stake in this? I didn’t go to Harvard. I’m not sending my kid to Harvard. I really don’t like Harvard that much. It seems that this is about a different group of people. Harvard is getting what they deserve. Or in any case, it doesn’t matter much to me.” Would you say something to someone with that attitude?
Garber: I would ask them to learn a little bit more, not only about Harvard, but about universities like Harvard – that is research universities. Our university is all about teaching and learning. Much of the university’s activities are related to research. There’s so many discoveries that have come from Harvard and other research universities, advances in cancer and treatments of cancer of all kinds.
Source: As Trump targets elite schools, Harvard’s president says they should ‘stand firm’
What Is the Most Effective Use of the Federal Government Funding for Research? A Question Garber: The American People Are Getting Used to Isolating Research
The federal government can reprogram funds through the budgeting process. But the question to ask is what problem is he trying to solve by doing that? Almost all of the federal support that we receive goes to research universities in the form of grants and contracts, which are mostly used to pay for work that we do for the government. So in reallocating to some other use, including trade schools, it means that work just won’t be performed. So the right question is, is this the most effective use of federal funding? Do you want to stop spending money on research? I’m less concerned about whether it goes to a trade school or if it goes to some other project, like working on highways. The real question is, how much value does the federal government get from its expenditures on research? There is a lot of actual research demonstrating the returns to the American people have been enormous.
The person said, Garber: Well, they said that. I’ve repeated it myself, and I need to believe it. And that is how it’s understood by the other leaders of other universities that I have spoken to. It is a warning. They see this as a message that if you don’t comply with what we’re demanding, these will be the consequences.